TaskHawk Systems

Verification before autonomous action becomes operational.

TaskHawk Systems builds formally verified infrastructure to check when autonomous software may act in operational settings. Checked release points sit before software can spend, disclose, mutate, invoke, release, or actuate. Kevros is one commercial product in that portfolio: a verified release and evidence gateway for policy-gated software actions.

Review Kevros and procurement options Start readiness review Review artifacts

Virginia SWaM Small/Micro certified
SAM.gov active: CAGE 10YV4
Procurement review material
UEI RZCQRY4J5GV3

Operating premise

The release point is the moment an autonomous decision becomes an action. TaskHawk checks verification there, records the decision, and leaves a reviewer with evidence that can be checked independently.

Advisory logic proposes. Kevros verifies release. Intelligence and release clearance stay separated by design.

Product discipline

One verified release model. Multiple implementation paths.

Kevros

Verified release and evidence gateway for protected software actions, tool calls, cloud changes, data release, and operational automation.

Commercial product

Operational boundaries

Controlled review paths for systems where software action can create physical, mission, financial, or regulated service consequence.

Operational review

Evidence systems

Verification artifacts, hash-chain checks, formal models, and procurement support material maintained as part of the product discipline.

Verifier-facing record

Evidence model

Release clearance is treated as a verifiable state transition.

Before action The requested operation is evaluated against policy, freshness, replay risk, and operating constraints. Failure, ambiguity, or missing verification closes to denial.

At release A signed release token binds the decision to the request context, policy input, and reviewer-visible metadata.

Afterward The decision is recorded in an append-only hash chain so a reviewer can check sequence integrity and tampering risk.

Review audiences

Written for reviewers who need specificity and verifiable evidence.

Government and defense

Security documentation, procurement support, and controlled review material for qualified public-sector review.

Enterprise security

Private deployment patterns, clear failure semantics, and signed evidence designed for existing IAM, SIEM, and operational review.

Research review

Formal methods, reproducible verifier artifacts, and a clear separation between public verification summaries and controlled technical detail.

Entry points

Three practical review paths.

Enterprise

Review the enforcement gateway, deployment model, and evidence interface for production autonomous systems.

Request a briefing

Government

Review CMMC, NIST, procurement, and documentation posture.

Government overview

Integrations

Use the verification API and controlled integration material for approved review work.

Review integrations